Posted: 02/09/2009 - Recently the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (AMS) featured an editorial suggesting to broadcast meteorologists that they should become familiar with (and adopt) the ‘consensus position’ as outlined by the IPCC Fourth Assessment and the AMS in its Statement on Climate Change. It appears that the governing boards of these organizations buckled to pressure from those promoting the politically correct view of UN and Gore-inspired science. These organizations have been overtaken by alarmists. Because broadcasters do not stand to benefit from the research dollars and the senior members have lived through warming and cooling cycles before, they tend to be more objective and balanced on the issue, acknowledging some influence of man on climate but also recognizing the importance of natural variability and cycles. With my experience as chief meteorologist for two large weather companies and after having addressed the Broadcasters on Global Warming and with my many contacts in operational meteorology, climatology and broadcasting, I believe the majority of rank and file members with those specialties (as much as 60 or 70%) do not buy the man is entirely responsible for climate change dogma. But the societies use their statements and like the IPCC imply full support of all the scientists involved. There would be a mass exodus of AMS members if their jobs didn’t depend on the seals or certification or fellow designation. This kind of exodus occurred in the 1970s when the National Weather Association was formed because the AMS moved more towards Academia and no longer served the needs of the operational meteorologist. A PRICE TO PAY Very soon when a suddenly less active sun and decadal shifts back to colder oceans cause global temperatures to clearly fall (we actually have not risen now in 9 years and some measures have already started down), these societies, the UN and the media which is violating its own code of ethics by its on-sided coverage of the issue must be held accountable for their actions and any harm their advocacy positions cause to the world’s economies and its people.